9/11: the American Reichstag Fire
the Achilles heel of the Bush regime
Cheney's crime, not an intelligence "failure"
an inside job, but not all claims are true
the 21st Century began on September 11, 2001
on this page:
9/11 research is a rabbit-hole of Byzantine complexity full of snares
and delusions and peopled with false friends, lunatics, earnest lost
souls and a few heroes. It's not necessary to understand all the nuances
of science and bureaucracy that allowed the government to get away
with mass murder, blame it on swarthy foreigners (of whom many are
eager accomplices)
and use the incident as (in the words of the Cheney, Jeb Bush et al
cabal, the Project for a New American Century) "a new Pearl Harbor." At
this critical juncture in human history, it's only necessary to understand
why they did it. The motive was Peak Oil, a disaster which will affect
everyone on the planet, about which all must enlighten themselves and
for which all must prepare.
-- Jenna Orkin, World Trade Center Environmental Organization
http://mikeruppert.blogspot.com/2007/05/epa-whistleblower-alleges-more-fraud.html
Crossing the Rubicon: Simplifying the
case against Dick Cheney
by Michael Kane
www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml
- Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick
Cheney was running a completely separate chain of Command & Control
via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air Force response
on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority
and technological capability to take supreme command in cases of national
emergency. Dick Cheney was the acting Commander in Chief on 9/11.
- Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000
and 2007, world oil production reaches its peak; from that point on,
every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more expensive
to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it.
Dick Cheney was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least
as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided the pretext for the series of
energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our lifetime."
- Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was
running multiple war games on the morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings
over the continental United States that included (at least) one "live-fly"
exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips"
on FAA radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events
of 9/11 to the point of the Air Force running drills involving hijacked
aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded. The war games & terror
drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter jocks
- who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able
to prevent the attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under
Dick Cheney's management.
 
New York newspapers, May 2002
download this graphic as a PDF file
9/11 was the psychological pretext used to get the Wars on Afghanistan, Iraq and possibly Iran started. While it is a relief to finally see much
of
the country turn against the War on Iraq, there has been very little
overt discussion of this pretext, or what the motivations were to start
the
illegal, unnecessary, destabilizing wars. While the full details remain
obscure, it is documented beyond any reasonable doubt that the administration
was repeatedly warned (by Britain, France,
Israel, Jordan, Morocco, Germany, Russia and other countries) that 9/11
was about to happen and at least five FBI investigations were squashed
to
make
sure
the attacks were not stopped. It is also very well documented that the
administration knew the world was about to reach "Peak
Oil" and that soon demand for petroleum would start to outstrip
supplies. Cheney's secretive Energy Task Force examined maps of
Middle
East oil fields in the months before 9/11 and the start of the alleged
"War on Terror" - so it seems reasonable to conclude that 9/11
was desired in order to allow the seizure of Iraqi oil fields, the second
largest on the planet.
September 11 was allowed and assisted engineered to create
the psychological trigger to seize the Earth's diminishing oil supplies
(the real reason behind the Iraq war) and to impose a "neo-feudalist" Homeland Security police state to suppress
dissent.
The best list of "unanswered questions" about 9/11 is from
the 9/11 Family Steering Committee, which includes the widows who forced
through the creation of the (severely flawed) official 9/11 commission.
Their list is posted at their website -- www.911independentinvestigation.org
-- and it is an excellent reference for any further investigation of these
important issues. It should not be surprising that the official Commission
praised the widows for their tenacity and then ignored almost all of their
questions.
In addition, the Complete 9/11 Timeline at www.cooperativeresearch.org
is the most detailed, careful compilation of evidence (sourced from the
mass media and direct testimony), and should be required reading for
anyone
wondering why some people question the official story. The 9/11 families
and the "Timeline" are profiled in a 2006 movie "9/11:
Press for Truth" which is an excellent introduction to these
topics. The film does not address every issue, but it carefully
sticks
to facts that are solidly documented, which is the best strategy for
success.
The best books about 9/11 are Crossing
the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age
of Oil by Michael Ruppert and The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and
the Anatomy of Terrorism by Nafeez Ahmed.
Unfortunately, there is a campaign to persuade skeptics that the plane
crashes were faked and other debunked, speculative and even ridiculous
claims, which makes the documented facts much more difficult to discern.
While the "Timeline" documents how at least 15 countries provided
warnings to the Bush administration - some of them extremely specific
about what, when, how -- the "wilder" claims about alleged
lack of plane crashes and demolition theories
gather most of the media attention. There are a number of hoaxes and speculations
that allegedly "prove" 9/11 complicity yet lack evidence that is documented beyond
websites referencing each other. Some of the false claims have been repeatedly debunked
by 9/11 truth activists but that doesn't prevent their continued dissemination. Focusing on the core issues
of how efforts to stop the attacks were thwarted and how standard operating
procedures were not followed that morning avoids most of this problem.
There is a legitimate need for the country to understand the motive: why 9/11 was
allowed to happen to enable the Iraq war (part of a larger effort to control the Middle East oil fields as the world passes the point of Peak Oil). Please take a small
amount of time to do a little homework to sift through the claims to understand
the documentation for them. The best documentation is not provided in
video clips of uncertain origin or speculation bounced from website to
website.
9/11: Bush’s Achilles Heel
The main reason Bush is still in the White House is that many people
think he responded well to the attacks. The film "Fahrenheit
9/11" was hated by the Bush administration because it touched
on the deeper, dangerous issues that could topple the regime. The images
of Bush reading "My Pet Goat" while the towers burned raises
the question why Bush was not engaged as Commander-in-Chief, summoning
the air defenses to stop the attacks. And if Bush wasn’t in charge,
who was?
Cheney’s crime
A book that was published during the 2004 election campaign provides credible
evidence that Vice President Richard Cheney, the man behind the throne,
was in charge of numerous military and intelligence "war games"
on 9/11. "Crossing
the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age
of Oil" by Michael Ruppert, accuses Cheney with coordinating
"war game" exercises that morning
that made the attacks possible. One of these was a "plane into building
scenario" at the National Reconnaissance Office near Dulles Airport,
Virginia (which runs US spy satellites). NORAD, the Air Force division
in charge of air defense, was running multiple exercises, including live
fly simulations, and radar “injects” (fake blips) that confused
air traffic controllers.
While Ruppert’s work has been ridiculed by the liberal "alternative"
media and ultra-conspiracy theorists (some of whom promote disinformation
claims that discredit real investigations), no one has made a substantial
challenge to the information about the role of the war games in ensuring
that the Air Force would not be able to stop 9/11.
A Zogby poll of New York City residents in August 2004 found that half
thought Bush Knew about 9/11 in advance. Many leading
Democrats privately think this, yet are scared to publicly say it --
even though it is probably the only scandal that could lead to impeachment
of Bush and Cheney. (The webmaster of oilempire.us was once privately told by a U.S. Senator that he knew Cheney ran wargames in the basement of the White House during the attacks. Other Democratic Party officials have also privately acknowledged to this writer that they know these facts.)
Follow the Money
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to admit
that the Pentagon could not account for $2.3
trillion (not billion) in spending. While this story is still on CBS’s
website, events the next day drowned out the coverage of this amazing
scandal. At that time, the Pentagon’s Comptroller (in charge of
the money), was Mr. Dov Zakheim, a member of the "Project
for a New American Century." Before he was put in charge of the
Pentagon’s budget, Mr. Zakheim was with a defense contractor that
makes remote control guidance systems for planes.
The intelligence failure of 9/11 is the failure
of the media and much of the public to point out the
obvious flaws in the official stories of September 11.
PEAK OIL is the real connection between Iraq and
9/11.
9/11 was allowed to happen (and given technical
assistance) to provide the pretext to seize the Middle East oil fields
in preparation for Peak Oil.
the Republican convention in New York, 911/2004
-- returning to the scene of their crime
the myth of 9/11 is that a larger police state system
would have been able to stop it from happening however, the evidence strongly
suggests that 9/11 was an inside job, with the goals of domestic fascism
and global empire
The Department of Homeland Security's national
ID card would not have done anything to prevent 9/11.
Warnings came from 15 countries, some of them very
specific: there was no "intelligence failure" that requires
more police state powers -- it was an intelligence CRIME.
Michael Moore's movie "Fahrenheit 9/11"
is very good, but it does not analyze who the perpetrators of 9/11 were.
To answer that question, one must ask: "Who had the power to turn
off the Air Force protection of New York and Washington?" None of
the various "fall guys" -- Saudis, Pakistanis, Egyptians and
Israelis -- have that power.
On September 11, the National Reconnaissance Office
(which runs the spy satellites), was conducting a "plane into building"
scenario with the CIA at the NRO's Virginia headquarters (near Dulles
airport). This was not a "terrorism" exercise, it merely tested
the emergency response that would be be needed if a plane crashed into
the NRO headquarters. This exercise resulted in the evacuation of America's
spy satellite control center just as the 9/11 "attacks" began,
reducing the number of intelligence officials capable of monitoring what
was going on.
NORAD was also conducting war
games on 9/11 -- Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian
and Northern Vigilance -- war games that managed to paralyze part of the
air defense system, making an effective response to the hijacked planes
impossible. The "new Warren Commission" did not investigate
the NRO or NORAD war games on 9/11.
Gen. Ralph Eberhart, commander of NORAD on 9/11
was promoted to head the new "Northern Command"
afterwards if 9/11 had been an intelligence "failure" General
Eberhart would have been court-martialed
The 9/11 Commission report blames the failure of
the military to protect the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on the
Federal Aviation Administration's alleged incompetence. Supposedly, the
FAA was unable to follow long established procedures to alert the Air
Force that four planes were off course. However, the FAA was competent
enough to safely land more than four thousand four hundred planes at airports
that were not expecting them (when all planes were ordered out of the
air shortly after the second tower was struck). Obviously, the FAA has
less political power than NORAD, and therefore had to take the blame.
| 9/11:
pretext for World War |
Rebuilding America's Defenses, September
2000, Project for a New American Century
Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush and the rest of the neo-conservatives
... While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in
the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein ...
... the process of [military] transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one,
absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a
new Pearl Harbor ...
... advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target"
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of
terror to a politically useful tool.
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural
society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign
policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly
massive and widely perceived direct external threat."
-- "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic
Imperatives," by Zbigniew Brzezinski (1997),
Council on Foreign Relations, National Security Advisor to President Carter
and adviser to Presidents Reagan and Bush the First
"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could
have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan
but for what happened on September 11."
-- Tony Blair comments to the Commons liaison committee,
(London) Times, July 17 2002 http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1036687,00.html
| The Archeology
of 9/11: unearthing the evidence |
Sifting through the volumes of 9/11 evidence is analogous
to archeology. Only some of the evidence for the distant ancestors of
all living beings has been unearthed and catalogued. However, the fact
that the currently known fossil record is incomplete does not prevent
science from attempting to determine patterns and draw tentative conclusions
about the history of life on Earth, knowing that additional evidence is
likely to alter the story as we gain further knowledge. The early days
of archeology saw spectacular forgeries "revealed" by unscrupulous
advocates of particular theories, which parallels current efforts to distract
and discredit 9/11 skeptics with disinformation. It is unlikely that any
story of 9/11 is completely true, and hopefully enough of the documentation
will be made public in the years to come - and enough whistleblowers step
forward - so that historians will be able to more fully explain what happened
to the United States of America.
Whatever details future archeologists of truth will unearth
are unlikely to discredit the Reichstag Fire paradigm for understanding
9/11 - they merely will add to our understanding of the details of how
the "Reichstag" was burned. The real issue is to explain why the attacks were perpetrated.
For most North Americans, 9/11 is a "cut and dried"
story - evil Arab terrorists attacked the US, there's nothing more to
learn. At worst, in many people's minds, there was an "intelligence
failure" of missed warnings that need to be addressed to prevent
a repeat (the excuse for the new Homeland Security behemoth). However,
there are lots of "unanswered questions" that suggest a much
different story:
- a flight school drop out managed to execute a high speed, high G fighter
pilot maneuver into the nearly empty, under reconstruction part of the
Pentagon despite the refusal to rent him a single engine plane the previous
month (they said he had no flying skills),
- that the hijackers left behind an Arabic language flight manual in
their rental car in Boston (similar to evidence planted to incriminate
Lee Harvey Oswald as the assassin despite the physical impossibility of
the claim that he was the "lone gunman")
- why the "black boxes" couldn't be found from the planes
yet a paper passport of a hijacker somehow survived the fireballs and
was found on the streets of lower manhattan
- why Bush thought that reading to second graders was more important
for him than to respond to the alleged surprise attacks (at 9:05 am on
9/11/2001)
- why was the CIA ran a simulation of
a plane hitting the National Reconnaissance Office HQ (near Dulles)
on 9/11
- why numerous warnings from allied governments
were supposedly ignored (at least a dozen countries, possibly more, warned
the US that 9/11 was coming)
- the absolute failure to scramble interceptors in a timely fashion,
despite decades of well-established military and FAA procedures. The fact
that Bush stayed in a second grade classroom reading about a "Girl
and her pet goat" instead of cancelling the event and pretending
to be commander-in-chief is damning evidence of prior knowledge by Bush,
his staff, the secret service and the military hierarchy (or at least
a faction of it).
- why the General in charge of Air Defense received a PROMOTION to run the "domestic" use of the US military
(the "Northern Command," established
October 2002)
- why the planes that eventually were scrambled traveled much, much
slower than they are capable of traveling, especially in an emergency
(ie. after the second tower was hit but before the Pentagon)
- why the part of the Pentagon that was hit
was the only part that had almost no one in it, and the part that had
been recently strengthened against such an attack
- why the CEO of Fiduciary (in the towers) just happened to be at a
breakfast "fundraiser" sponsored by Warren Buffett at Offutt
AFB (strange place for a charity fundraiser) on 9/11,
the same base that Bush went to in the afternoon
- On the morning of 9/11, Sen. Graham met with the head of Pakistan's
ISI (their CIA), who is alleged to have sent $100,000 to Mohammed Atta,
the alleged leader of the alleged terrorists ("alleged" because
several of those names were identity thefts - the people named are still
alive, according to the BBC and several other media sources).
- why Bush showed no reaction when told of the attacks, and kept reading
to second graders (and why his aide, Andrew Card, didn't even wait to
ask for a reply from the "President")
- why Bush had anti-aircraft missiles set up around Genoa, Italy during
the July 2001 G-8 summit (due to concerns about a 9-11 type attack) but
not around the Capitol despite numerous warnings that 9-11 was coming
- long standing ties between the CIA, Pakistan's ISI, the Saudis, al-Qaeda,
and between the Bush and Bin Laden families
- the anthrax attacks traced back to Fort Detrick - www.oilempire.us/anthrax.html
- repeated pattern of manufactured pretexts for galvanizing support for
imperial wars - the blowing up of the Maine (1898), Pearl Harbor (which
was allowed to happen, FDR had prior knowledge due to communication intercepts),
the Gulf of Tonkin (1964), Operation Northwoods (1962 Pentagon plan to
stage terror attacks on US citizens to justify invasion of Cuba), the
encouragement of Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait (1990), the first
WTC attack in 1993 (which the FBI knew about in advance), Oklahoma City
in 1995 (in which there was also "prior knowledge" at the very
least) - www.oilempire.us/parallels.html
- why the director of the "commission" to investigate 9/11 is a business partner of Osama bin Laden's brother in law (Gov Thomas
Kean, formerly of New Jersey, is a director of Amerada Hess, which is
invested in the Saudi consortium to build the fabled pipeline across Afghanistan
...) Even Fortune magazine has picked up on that.
- why the Bush regime interfered with the investigation of al-Qaeda
before 9/11, something that FBI whistleblowers, journalist Greg Palast
and FBI counterterrorism director John O'Neill charged.
911independentcommission.org
family members had tough "unanswered questions" for Bush,
the official Commission, Giuliani and others. Most of their questions
were ignored by the official Comission report, although many chose to
endorse the Commission anyway. Some of the Independent Commission affiliated
family members endorsed Paul Thompson's excellent book "The Terror
Timeline," which documents how 9/11 was not a surprise attack using
well documented, verifiable evidence.
911pressfortruth.com
Website for the movie Press for Truth about the 9/11 families (who
were part of the "independent commission" effort) and Paul
Thompson, creator of the Complete 9/11 Timeline.
911review.com
"Physical evidence" focused website from Jim Hoffman, author
of wtc7.net and 911research.com. Its strength is in debunking some of
the sillier false claims for complicity, which is a rare trait in the
9/11 truth movement (peer review and fact checking are not popular activities
for those who got snared by some of the bait).
cooperativeresearch.org
The Complete 9/11 Timeline from the Center for Cooperative Research
the basis for Paul Thompson's book "The Terror
Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute"
an amazing, impeccable, irrefutable database of over 1,000 corporate
media articles that show that 9/11 was not a surprise attack. The best
site to show to anyone still clinging to the official story that 9/11
was a surprise attack.
The best research guide about 9/11.
digitalstylecreations.com
and digitalstyledesigns.com
multimedia in support of 9/11 truth.
flight93crash.com
the story of the shootdown of the fourth plane
a useful antidote to two type of propaganda: the official story, and
the disinformation claiming the plane crashes did not happen
fromthewilderness.com
The best investigation of
how and why 9/11 was perpetrated.
Michael Ruppert's book "Crossing the Rubicon:
The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil"
This investigation has been publicly attacked more than any other independent
effort, which is a testament to its effectiveness. This site probed
deeper than the corporate press into the "insider trading"
on United and American Airlines just before 9/11 (a story abandoned
by the corporate press after the trail didn't lead to anyone Islamic
- but rather to CIA connected businesses on Wall Street). From the Wilderness
has done the deepest examination of the 9/11 war games, and has the
best analysis of the motivation of Peak Oil in allowing 9/11 to happen.
FTW hosts the most articles with original, credible investigation of
9/11 -- any "9/11 truth" website that avoids mentioning the
incredible work of From the Wilderness is either uninformed or trying
to throw readers off course.
Crossing the Rubicon: Simplifying the
case against Dick Cheney
by Michael Kane
www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml
- Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick
Cheney was running a completely separate chain of Command & Control
via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air Force response
on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority
and technological capability to take supreme command in cases of national
emergency. Dick Cheney was the acting Commander in Chief on 9/11.
- Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000
and 2007, world oil production reaches its peak; from that point on,
every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more expensive
to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it.
Dick Cheney was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least
as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided the pretext for the series of
energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our lifetime."
- Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was
running multiple war games on the morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings
over the continental United States that included (at least) one "live-fly"
exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips"
on FAA radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events
of 9/11 to the point of the Air Force running drills involving hijacked
aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded. The war games & terror
drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter jocks
- who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able
to prevent the attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under
Dick Cheney's management.
frustratingfraud.blogspot.com
the Hijacking of the 9/11 Truth Movement by the No-Plane-at-the-Pentagon
Theory
a website started in Fall 2006 that focuses on what happened to the "truth"
movement, although some of the specific details about the history of the
hoax are not correct. It spends too much on the obscure conspiracy
theorists who are peripheral to the actual story. This site has been pressured
by "no-planers" and has been renamed part of the title from
"No Plane" to "No 757" in deference to those who pretend
there is any evidence (there isn't) for an alleged crash of a smaller-than-757
plane.
judgeforyourself.us
John Judge's research on 9/11 and other scandals
His writings are also archived at www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/
-- some of the best analyses of deep politics.
justacitizen.com
Sibel Edmonds, an FBI whistleblower gagged by a federal
Court injunction, discloses some of what she knows on her website.
justicefor911.org
an effort to get New York's attorney general Spitzer to prosecute
the crimes -- which was ignored, especially after "no planers"
flooded Spitzer's office with wild speculation and hoaxes, thus letting
him know that if opened this can of worms this is the type of material
he would be associated with in the public mind - Spitzer ignored 9/11
issues and successfully ran for Governor of New York
nafeez.blogspot.com
writings by Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed, author of "The War
on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation, and the Anatomy of Terrorism."
http://nafeez.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-911-families-are-saying.html
Friday, September 15, 2006
What the 9/11 Families are Saying
One of the things that really bothers me is the marginalization of
the 9/11 families, the people who lost their loved ones in the 9/11
terrorist attacks. Not only have the families, and their call
for an investigation even now, been marginalized by the Bush administration;
they have also been marginalized by the 9/11 "truth" movement
which has largely shown little interest in what the families have
been saying.
More than anyone, it's been the 9/11 families who have been at the
forefront of the ongoing campaign for an independent public inquiry
into the attacks that might truly hold the authorities to account,
and result in full disclosure of what happened, how and why. Indeed,
one of the most powerful resources demonstrating how little
we really know about 9/11 comes in the form of the huge list of 9/11
Unanswered Questions on the website of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee
for the 9/11 Independent Commission.
oilempire.us
(this website)
A political map to understand Peak Oil and 9/11
Propaganda Patterns:
Limited Hang Outs, Discrediting Disinformation
www.oilempire.us/map.html
Connected Dots:
9/11, Peak Oil, Climate Change, World War, Media, Homeland Security, Fake Elections
www.oilempire.us/dots.html
Jamey Hecht
http://poetrypoliticscollapse.blogspot.com/2008/09/seeking-to-hire-ignorant-ghostwriter.html
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2008
Seeking to Hire Ignorant Ghostwriter for Book That Already Exists
Beginning on the day of the attack, the 9/11 Truth Movement ran the same inevitable course repeated by domestic dissent and political critique so many times: formation, momentum, growth, penetration by unidentified representatives of the critiqued; disinformation campaigns; factionalization, and fizzle. It is always possible, however, to rebuild and extend the work of social repair that such movements represent. Apart from that utopian ambition, it’s inherently valuable just to make sense of the attacks and assassinations, the engineered coups des etats and the falsely triggered wars. That sense-making happens in paperback-and-podium argumentation pitched at various levels of sophistication for various audiences; it happens in documentaries; and it can happens in the arts. It cannot happen in the courts: published in September 2004, Mike Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon was a solidly documented, robustly argued legal case against Dick Cheney and others, constructed strictly around means, motive, and opportunity. Though it remains the 2nd or 3rd best-selling book on 9/11 after the Kean Report itself, Rubicon has been resolutely ignored by the mainstream media and gone unchallenged by any legal (or other) representative of those it accuses. The way to get media attention is to publish – wittingly or unwittingly – a true story mixed with a poison pill of disinformation.
politicalassassinations.com
www.politicalassassinations.com/New%20Research.html
“JFK, Watergate, 9/11:
Recurring Patterns in America’s Deep Events"
Professor Peter Dale Scott
ratical.org
Crimes Against Humanity: 9/11, covert operations, and alternative
visions
one of the best sites on the internet
Domestic Terrorism: The Big Lie
The "War" On Terrorism is a Total Fabrication
www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/AOPof911p11.html
be mindful of the fundamental contradictions that misrepresent
the very foundations of Bush II's purported "war" on terrorism.
Our U.S. intelligence agencies, funded annually for decades with increasingly
extravagant budgets, claim they were unable to prevent the 9-11 bombings
due to the lack of correlated intelligence gathered. Yet within the
span of less than a day, these same agencies asserted the identity of
those responsible with such certainty as to preclude any serious investigation
of other possible perpetrators. Whose interests are truly served by
such investigations and their near instantaneous conclusions?
rigorousintuition.ca
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com
http://rigint.blogspot.com
The best "blog" (web-log) on 9/11 related information.
It covers a lot of topics, including some very fringe material (which
it handles well, although 100% accuracy is always a challenge when exploring
these depths - it would be a relief if some of this material is exaggerated).
Rigorous Intuition is one of the few 9/11 related websites to recommend
that "truth activists" focus on what is proven and provable,
instead of speculations and hoaxes about alleged physical evidence.
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/06/dont-get-used-to-it.html
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/06/sound-of-one-hand-slapping.html
FBI foreknowledge and the excuse of incompetence
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/05/cynical-sophisticated-and-subtle.html
parallels between the JFK and 9/11 truth movements
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/05/let-me-put-it-this-way.html
more on fake versus real evidence
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/05/guns-of-911.html
9/11 evidence and lessons from the JFK Truth Movement
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/02/sibels-way.html
Sibel Edmonds, 9/11 whistleblower
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabotage-of-ptech.html
Homeland Security and 9/11 complicity
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/12/ten-things-we-learned-in-2004-about.html
an update on the real new news about 9/11 during 2004
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/09/riddle-of-transponders.html
good analysis of war games
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/09/flying-wedge.html
how the "no plane" hoax divided the skeptics
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html
original article on this site, great summary of basic issues
summeroftruth.org
the Summer of Truth campaign in New York, lots of background
information and excellent analysis
thememoryhole.org
www.thememoryhole.org/911/
has archived documentation about foreknowledge, video of Bush reading
"the Pet Goat" and other useful pieces of evidence.
they-let-it-happen.blogspot.com
The Synchronized Failures of Defense on 9/11
(from the same author of Frustrating Fraud)
totuus
www.kolumbus.fi/totuus/index.html
What is the Truth on 9/11?
a website in Finland with sensible (truthful) perspectives on 9/11, including
the "no plane" and "mini-nuke" nonsense
truthmove.org
website about 9/11 truth in context with broader perspectives
the best new 9/11 website of 2006
the "truth move" discussion forum has the best signal to noise
ratio of any of the on-line discussion forums - the greatest amount of
good information and the least amount of attacking disinformation, although
at least one
poster calls this website government sponsored for pointing out that
the plane really did hit the Pentagon. This verifies the conclusion taken
by this website in 2004 that a "free for all" forum
on these controversies is probably impossible to screen out shrill attackers
who promote false claims.
www.truthmove.org/911voices/
nice slideshow introduction to key concerns and credible skeptics of the
official story
www.truthmove.org/content/9-11-truth/
introduction to 9/11 pages
www.truthmove.org/content/disinformation/
Disinformation - Infiltration, Misinformation, Disruption
The 9/11 truth movement is a prime target for disinformation, infiltration,
and other forms of sabotage by forces who do not want the truth to be
known. You can imagine that if mainstream anti-war and environmental groups
have regularly been infiltrated, something as radical and revolutionary
as 9/11 truth would demand a very sophisticated counterintelligence campaign.
Agents of disinformation may not “play their hand” until the
right moment and disinformation must appear credible in order to be effective.
Deceptive evidence is often delivered alongside accurate information.
Disinformation requires intentionality while misinformation does not.
In the 9/11 truth movement, you will come across both—evidence,
materials, researchers, and groups that either consciously or unconsciously
promote false or misleading information. Much incorrect information within
the 9/11 truth community likely began as disinformation but has been perpetuated
as unintentional misinformation.
The objectives and methods of disinformation are quite sophisticated.
Here are a few of the main strategies:
- The Straw Man Argument/Sensationalism - by promoting speculative,
sensational, and false evidence, opponents can setup easily debunkable
or dismissable points that can be used to lend credence to their position.
....
- Muddying the Waters - making it harder to discern the real evidence/researchers/websites
from the fake ones. ....
- Death by Association - by including the target idea/individual/movement
along with another topic or personality that is disliked or discredited
(UFOs, anti-semitism, nazis, etc.), the original subject can be smeared
and dismissed. ....
- Paranoia/Divide and Conquer - one of the most effective ways to destroy
a group is to sow distrust among members.
wtceo.org
World Trade Center Environmental Organization (advocacy
for those poisoned by the dust clouds from the collapsing towers)
also mirrored at 911ea.org
9/11 Environmental Action
New York City based effort for truth and justice about 9/11
www.counterpunch.org/orkin03052005.html
"Racism, Fairy-tale Wealth and Idi Amin
Memories of Kawaggi, Saudi Arabia"
By JENNA ORKIN
March 5 / 6, 2005
a related resource on the health consequences of 9/11 is
Mesothelioma & Asbestos Awareness Center
www.maacenter.org/jobsites/WTC/asbestos.php
After the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001, many people were
exposed to a deadly cloud of dust. This dust contained thousands of deadly
chemicals including the carcinogen asbestos. As a result, many
people are being diagnosed with the deadly cancer mesothelioma.
wtc7.net
best "physical evidence" 9/11 site, focused on the
collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
This site also sponsors 911research.com
- a broader investigation into the 9/11 attacks and 911review.com
(focused on the disinformation efforts infiltrating the 9/11
truth movement).
| A small
list of important articles about 9/11 |
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1036687,00.html
"This war on terrorism is bogus:
The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its
global domination"
Michael Meacher, Saturday September
6, 2003, The Guardian
Was this inaction [the Air Force "stand
down"] simply the result of key people disregarding, or being
ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security
operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11?
If so, why, and on whose authority? The former US federal crimes prosecutor,
John Loftus, has said: "The information provided
by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that
it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence
of incompetence." ....
.... the so-called "war on terrorism" is being used largely
as bogus cover for achieving wider US strategic
geopolitical objectives. ....
The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the "go" button for
a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise
have been politically impossible to implement.
The overriding motivation for this political smokescreen
is that the US and the UK are beginning to run out of secure hydrocarbon
energy supplies. By 2010 the Muslim world will control as much
as 60% of the world's oil production and, even more importantly, 95%
of remaining global oil export capacity. As demand is increasing, so
supply is decreasing, continually since the 1960s. ....
The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the "global
war on terrorism" has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated
to pave the way for a wholly different agenda - the US goal of world
hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies
required to drive the whole project.
www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,574809,00.html
Gagging the sceptics
The US, founded to protect basic freedoms, is now insisting that its
critics are its enemies
George Monbiot
Tuesday October 16, 2001
The Guardian
There are plenty of reasons to be sceptical. The magical appearance
of the terrorists' luggage, passports and flight manual looks rather
too good to be true. The dossier of "evidence" purporting
to establish Bin Laden's guilt consists largely of supposition and conjecture.
The ration packs being dropped on Afghanistan have no conceivable purpose
other than to create the false impression that starving people are being
fed. Even the anthrax scare looks suspiciously convenient. Just as the
hawks in Washington were losing the public argument about extending
the war to other countries, journalists start receiving envelopes full
of bacteria, which might as well have been labelled "a gift from
Iraq". This could indeed be the work of terrorists, who may have
their own reasons for widening the conflict, but there are plenty of
other ruthless operators who would benefit from a shift in public opinion.
Democracy is sustained not by public trust but by public scepticism.
Unless we are prepared to question, to expose, to challenge and to dissent,
we conspire in the demise of the system for which our governments are
supposed to be fighting. The true defenders of America are those who
are now being told that they are anti-American.
note: in early 2007, Mr. Monbiot wrote two articles for his column decrying
9/11 conspiracy theories, persuaded by Loose
Change and its variations that there was no truth to any of this.
The far-out false claims succeeded in alienating someone who had healthy
skepticism immediately after the attacks.
Lt. Col. Steve Butler
vice chancellor for student affairs at the Defense Language Institute
in Monterey, California -- a US military facility that one or more of
the hijackers reportedly attended during the 1990s.
Monterey County Herald, The (CA)
May 26, 2002
Page: F2
A contemptible offense
It's about time conservative idiots like Steve Kelly and Rod Musgrove
got a dose of reality. Of course President Bush knew about the impending
attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because
he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama.
His presidency was going nowhere. He wasn't elected by the American people,
but placed into the Oval Office by the conservative supreme court. The
economy was sliding into the usual Republican pits and he needed something
on which to hang his presidency.
For them to accuse Democrats of being "sleazy" is laughable.
Isn't it ironic that Kelly begins his inane babble with a reference to
Monica Lewinsky? How many people died because of Monica Lewinsky? And
for Musgrove to call the assertions "contemptible" is another
joke. Funny how he manages to make disparaging remarks about President
Clinton, as well.
Face it people, Bill Clinton was a great president. This guy is a joke.
What is sleazy and contemptible is the President of the United States
not telling the American people what he knows for political gain. The
Democrats asking pertinent questions is their duty as public servants.
Steve Butler
Monterey
9/11 Evidence - Smoking Gun ... by
Cheryl Seal
www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0206/S00071.htm
also at
www.unknownnews.net/cdd052002.html
one of the best articles describing the evidence and the motivations,
warnings, the curious nature of the Pentagon attack (on the mostly empty
part of the building), the Bush administration's interference with the
FBI investigation of al-Qaeda, and much more. One of the best articles
pointing out the likelihood of remote control of the four planes (hijacking
the hijackers).
At the very least Bush allowed 9/11 to happen. But the evidence indicates
his guilt involves more than just a huge intentional sin of omission
– this now seems certain. ...
.... why would Bush admit to having been warned about 9/11 in the first
place? In the corporate and political world, this admission is a strategy
that has been used over and over by creeps who are guilty of huge crimes
and know the heat is on. By confessing to a lesser charge, they try
to draw the heat away from the main, more dangerous issue.
www.wsws.org/articles/2006/oct2006/nib1-o04_prn.shtml
Causes and consequences of the “war on terror”
Part 1
By Nick Beams
4 October 2006
Canadian journalist and media commentator
Barrie Zwicker, whose January 2002 film The
Great Deception was the first serious documentary on 9/11 complicity (January
2002), made these comments on April 21, 2003 at the premier showing of
"Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11," San Francisco,
CA.
My offering is that 9/11
was what the anarchist Bakunin called "the propaganda of the act."
That it was "Reichstag Fire 2001."
That it was the greatest deception of its kind
ever foisted. And that's saying something, in light of the long
and totally-neglected history of this kind
of war-triggering deception perpetrated by powerful special interests
to sway public opinion in favour of deadly agendas that almost always
result in serious grief for just about everyone.
My offering is that 9/11 was arranged to jump
start the so-called war on terrorism, which in turn is the cover and
heat exchanger for hot wars, these being the toxic tip of the
machinery for world domination. At the levers
is a clique of neocons that has hijacked this
country's foreign policy at the behest largely and to the benefit mainly
of Big Arms and Big Oil, with the rest of the worst at the top, giving
the thumbs-up and boarding the gravy train.
The psychological trick at the heart of
September 11th, by the way, is that people confuse their compassion for
the victims with their certainty about who the perpetrators are. The public
was presented with instant perpetrators. The trick will most likely continue
working for all future planned invasions – looks as if Iraq is next
– so long as the public remains blindfolded by the media.
-- Barrie Zwicker, Canadian journalist and media commentator, from "The
Great Deception" (2002 movie about 9/11)
(Note: in 2006 Mr. Zwicker claimed that those who point
out that some claims of complicity are not actually true - particularly
the debunked "Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon" hoax - are
helping the government. In reality, the "no plane" claims were
created by the government to create a strawman to discredit legitimate
skepticism of the official story.)
Those who have fully studied the issues
and facts concerning 9/11 and the Bush administration's inexplicable coverup
and lies understand rationally that this is not a topic of "conspiracy
theory" but instead a true scandal of serious proportions. This can
no longer be denied. It is a scandal which, if aggressively pursued by
the media, should have helped hamstring and sideline the Bush administration
months ago, which would have made it politically impossible for them to
push ahead with their war plans in the first place.
www.questionsquestions.net/docs0209/0920_response.html
the "Truth about 9/11" could be a catalyst
for the collective transformation of the American people. The greatest
threat to the military / intelligence / industrial juggernaut, currently
making an imperial grab for world dominance and using 9/11 as a pretext,
is an informed American public, whom I believe, have the power to rein
in those forces.
-- Carol Brouillet, Deception Dollar project
Only one force on Earth can directly confront
and defeat the U.S. Corporate State and its criminal Government. That
force is us, the overwhelming majority of the people in this country.
-- Don Paul, author, "9/11: Facing Our Fascist State"
www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/0526_donpaul.html
www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/6/2088660.html
The miraculous timing of the 9/11 skyjackers, Part 1
by margieburns on Thu 06 Jul 2006
www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/8/2093537.html
"The Fog of War Games" -- the miraculous timing of the skyjackers,
part 2
by margieburns on Sat Jul 8 18:23 2006
www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1480940,00.html
The war on paperclips
I worry that I'm turning into a conspiracy theorist
AL Kennedy
Wednesday May 11, 2005
The Guardian
OK, I'm paranoid and depressed. My new government of troglodytes,
murderers and spivs barely elongates the customary scream I give upon
waking. What troubles me more is our rulers' inevitable recommencement
of the war on terror bollocks.
To begin at what we're told is the beginning, we have 9/11 - the one
in the US, not the earlier one in Chile when covert US government intervention
killed thousands of innocents and handed the country to a commerce-friendly,
torture-loving, far-right junta. Now if 9/11/2001 is so important, why
is it so hard to find out what happened?
The FBI, as we know, blocked all manner of investigations into the plot
in the run up to its execution, whether these involved highly specific
warnings from its own agents or from government sources in Afghanistan,
Argentina, Britain, the Cayman Islands, Egypt, France, Germany, Israel,
Italy, Jordan, Morocco and Russia.
Meanwhile, I worry why the nearest military aircraft weren't scrambled
to intercept any of the hijacked flights when this is standard procedure
and why, when more distant jets were finally aloft, they flew at less
than half speed, thus failing to prevent the impacts at the twin towers
and then, it would seem, managing to shoot down Flight
93 when its passengers may already have overcome its hijackers.
It would, of course, be easier to know what happened to Flight 93 if
there weren't - according to educated estimates - three minutes of the
cockpit recording missing. It would, equally, be handy to have access
to the black boxes from the other crashes. Firefighters at Ground Zero
have repeatedly stated that three of the four possible black boxes there
were found and taken away by government agents.
And these worries are maybe less important than the ones about clear
links between the Pakistani ISI, the CIA and the men named as the 9/11
hijackers. Or the mysterious inability of anyone to capture Osama bin
Laden, who fled from Tora Bora, possibly being evacuated by helicopter,
and then escaped to Pakistan unhindered.
So while Chinese paperclips are now made out of vital 9/11 evidence
and almost every implicated party goes free, we and our controlling
US interests continue fearlessly to terrorise countries unconnected
with the attacks, to place permanent military bases near oil reserves
and pipeline routes, to harass and murder Muslims anywhere we can, and
to foment terrorist resistance at every opportunity. The UK unmasks
non-existent ricin plots and threatens us with ID
cards, but we can't supply our troops in Iraq with working radios
or a legal causus belli.
But you'd never want to think that on 9/11/2001 covert US government
intervention killed thousands of innocents and handed the country, if
not the world, to a commerce-friendly, torture-loving,
far-right junta. That would make you a paranoid, depressed conspiracy
theorist. And, take it from me, that just wouldn't be comfortable.
www.sanderhicks.com/hopsickerinterview.html
HOPSICKER: See the basic story is and I need to tell you in just 30
seconds is [that] the government’s story is that I call the Magic
Dutch Boy theory. Remember the Kennedy assassination when the "magic
bullet" has passed thru three people, the only way they could make
a story of one lone gunman even remotely logically possible?
HICKS Most of the people never bought that and still don't.
HOPSICKER: Similarly, in 9/11, it’s only through the Magic Dutch
Boy theory that you can believe these people came over here without
the knowledge and consent of the U.S. government. The government's story
is that the year before the terrorists began to arrive in force, two
separate Dutch nationals purchased separately the two flight schools
at the Venice, Florida, airport, that, eight or nine months afterward,
began training terrorists how to fly.
HICKS: Right. But when it all sort of fell apart, both Dutch nationals
happened to have two separate aircraft accidents.
HOPSICKER: That's correct. They are inconvenient people at this point,
because if either one of them ever talked, it could bring down the government
of the current administration.
Top ten conspiracy theories of 2002
OF BIG OIL, BY BIG OIL, FOR BIG OIL
The 10 Most Startling Speculations and "Conspiracy Theories"
About September 11 and America's New War
[27 December 2002]
by Mike Ward
www.popmatters.com/features/021227-conspiracy.shtml
www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0301/S00008.htm
Top Ten Conspiracy Theories of 2002
Courtesy of Indymedia New York, Mike Ward of PopMatters lists
the most outrageous top ten officially spun conspiracy theories of the
year - Scoop Editor's Note: If you feel like a laugh then read this!
He forgot to mention the most outlandish conspiracy of them all (and the
most widely accepted): 19 hijackers from a third world terrorist group
armed with boxcutters forced 3 planes into 3 of the the nation's most
important and symbolic structures with no assistance from US government/intelligence
insiders.
www.empirewatch.org/archives/911/pages/essays/JFK_911_AndTheRealAmerica.html
JFK, 9/11 and the REAL America
Tying It All Together
by: Jon Phalen / November 22nd, 2003
the history of deception to lure reluctant US citizens to support wars.
Explores the evidence for Remote Control software
in the 9/11 hijackings (not too dissimilar from electronic hijacking of
our computerized election ballot machines).
A scandal in England and Ireland about a terrorist called "stakeknife"
concerned a thug for the IRA who was actually a British double agent (in
other words, the Brits ran one of the most ruthless IRA killers in order
to legitimize their occupation of northern Ireland).
The "false flag" operations by the Italian
fascists in Italy are well documented by many - one of the most notorious
was the bombing of the Bologna train station in 1980, perpetrated by the
fascists (with official ties) to blame on the "left" to create
the climate for a right wing military coup. The article below has crucial
information about the "P2," Operation Gladio and the Vatican
Bank - a story with disturbing parallels to the current situation in the
United States.
www.questionsquestions.net/kolskegg_911.html
9/11 IN CONTEXT: PLANS AND COUNTERPLANS
by Max Kolskegg
It is time to have a hard, clear-eyed look at our situation
here in this post-September 11 "brave new world order", on
the brink of a huge conflagration in the Middle East, with endless war
beyond. The Global Fascist Terror State has arrived, the fruit of decades
of planning, propaganda and provocation. September 11 was its coming-out
party, and for us, the last wake-up call. So now let's face
the facts. No more self-delusion, no more easy roads. The reality is
plain as day, and so therefore is our task
www.counterpunch.org/weiner0601.html
The Bush 9/11 Scandal for Dummies by Bernard Weiner
June 1, 2002
A very good introductory article that points out the likelihood
that Bush's notorious month-long "vacation" at his so-called
ranch near Crawford, Texas was probably a long planning meeting for
the post-9/11 political environment.
www.narconews.com/goff1.html
"The So-Called Evidence Is a Farce" By Stan Goff
written shortly after 9/11, this is still one of the best articles explaining
the political context and the phony evidence for the official story
www.attackonamerica.net/ignorad.htm
-- MSNBC article on the standdown by a (now
deceased) mainstream journalist
http://wsws.org/articles/2002/jan2002/sept-j24.shtml
why is there no investigation of what happened?
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/02/sibels-way.html
If I had to choose just four links to show your average joe and jane,
and pique their interest in the possibility of a 9/11 coverup, these
would be my top picks right now:
1. The wargames acknowledgement AP
report. The SF Chronicle is the only paper I know of that still
has the original AP report available in their archives.
2. Senator
Dayton's declaration that NORAD and the FAA lied. He announced it
during the week of the Dem's National Convention last year. He's got
a pair.
3. This in
depth timeline of the event of that day certainly points toward
high-level government deception. It's long, but fascinating and crucial
to understanding just what Senator Dayton was talking about.
4. And then finally This
gem of a report on the destruction of the FAA controller tapes.
No coverup is complete without the destruction of evidence :-)
I think the best way to wake up more of the public is to let them
see with their own eyes the evidence that the 9/11 truth movement has
been pointing to all along, and the more official the source, the better.
I guess that's why I like the FAA/NORAD lying angle for leading
people into the seemy underworld of 9/11. It's one of the aspects of
the whole event that's fairly well documented in the mainstream press,
giving us the opportunity to point this stuff out without referring
to news sources considered illegitimate by a public that still can't
imagine the media would or even could tell such Big Lies.
www.osamaskidneys.com [no longer on-line]
What is the true story of the Sept. 11 attacks?
We do not know, because it is shrouded in secrecy. But thousands of
9/11 Skeptics on the Internet have used evidence from the mainstream
and foreign press to demonstrate beyond doubt that the official story
is incomplete, inconsistent and rife with lies. In March and April 2002,
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) became the first American politician
on the federal level to question the official story and suggest that
elements of the U.S. government may have known of the attacks in advance.
On May 16 [2002], the White House was forced to admit receiving warnings,
in the months before Sept. 11, of a Qaeda plot to hijack airliners in
the United States. This admission was coupled with the claim that no
one in the administration could have guessed that these planes would
be used in suicide attacks - a demonstrable falsehood. Since then, many
revelations from government agencies have corroborated the 9/11 Skeptics'
claims that pre-Sept. 11 investigations by the FBI, which might have
prevented the attacks, were obstructed from within the government. The
government also confirmed that the war in Afghanistan was prepared
in advance of Sept. 11, and that a finished plan for the war was presented
to George W. Bush two days before the attacks on New York and Washington.
By then, large British and American forces had already arrived or were
underway to the Central Asian theater. In an effort at damage
control, the revelations of the past month have been limited. Congressional
investigators and the mainstream U.S. media have made little effort
to connect the dots logically, which would yield an even more troubling
picture of the government's actions at the highest levels. Attention
has focused instead on middle-level "failures" of bureaucracy
and analysis, with an accompanying campaign to justify more radical
surveillance and police measures and the creation of a new Homeland
Security Department. But the revelations have served to support many
of the cardinal assertions of the oft-maligned 9/11 Skeptics movement.
On June 10 [2002], C-SPAN refused to broadcast a major press conference
in Washington organized by former government officials, relatives of
9/11 victims and investigative journalists, who posed vital "Unanswered
Questions" about the attacks and their true background. This
setback was predictable; the issue is still too controversial for the
mainstream media. 9/11 Skeptics should not therefore despair. The time
has come for skeptics to unite, to speak openly, to stay loud and proud,
and to employ creative, determined and peaceful means with heart and
humor, to force disclosure of the full story of the Sept. 11 attacks.
History is with us!
The Center for an Informed America (CIA) NEWSLETTER #42 August 25,
2003
I started flipping through the channels to see what else was on, and
in doing so, I happened to catch a snippet of what I assume was some kind
of archival footage of a master spy, named "Maxwell Smart,"
discussing what was presumably classified information with some shadowy
figure identified only as "The Chief." The footage was shot
in 1966, and the topic of discussion was the possibility of "KAOS,"
described as "an international organization of evil," going
out of business. Here is the verbatim transcript of what I heard:
Agent Smart: Wait a minute, Chief. If KAOS goes out of
business, what happens to us?
Chief: Well, I guess the Control organization would be out of business
too. There wouldn't be any need for us.
Agent Smart: Well, maybe we could get together and give KAOS enough
money to keep going for a few years.
Chief: Max, that's a ridiculous notion! That would be like the police
cooperating with organized crime! How would you like that?!
Agent Smart: Well, it seems to work in the big cities.
An "international organization of evil"? The 'good' guys covertly
funding the 'bad' guys, thus artificially creating 'KAOS,' and along with
it the need for ever more 'Control' organizations? Don't look now, folks,
but I think we're living in Maxwell Smart's world. davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr42.html
(this newsletter is a mix of good and
false claims, promoting abiotic oil and the
"no Pentagon plane crash" hoax,
but this reference to the "Get Smart" TV show is excellent |
