![]() |
|
start here
Beyond Bush
Truth & Reconciliation Commission for US Empire
Beyond Bush: Regime Rotation Joe Biden's plan to partition Iraq Barack Hussein Obama Clinton Bush connections JFK: November 22, 1963 MLK: Martyr for Peace Carter: the missed opportunity Zbignew Brzezinski's warning not to attack Iran Method to their Madness November Surprise 2006: elites wanted Democrats to win New Middle East Map
new Mid East map
Biden & Iraqi partition Iraq - oil & religion Iran - oil & ethnicity Saudi Arabia - oil areas War on Iraq Peak Oil motive method to their madness Beyond Bush: regime rotation, not regime change - elites stay in power Bush / Cheney: bad cop Obama / Biden: good cop problem -> reaction -> solution Peak Money
Connected Dots
Connected Dots Timelines
NEW PAGES: JFK and the Unspeakable DOTS TO CONNECT: RELATED WEBSITES: Global Permaculture.org
Peak Oil
Triple Crisis: Peak Oil
Climate Change - Overshoot Offshore Drilling on a Swift Boat: geology more important than politics of blame Peaked Oil: It's here Peak experts: geologists Peak Scenarios Olduvai Gorge theory Gas Prices: Pique Oil OPEC Quota Wars Alaska peaked in 1988 oil timeline from 1859 websites - books - movies Peak Everything Else
War on Terror: PetroPolitics
Disaster Capitalism
Climate Change
Ecological Limits
Sustainabullshit: Greenwash
9/11 Best Evidence
the American Reichstag
Fire
allowed to happen & given technical assistance some claims are not true best websites, articles best evidence of complicity Political Map of 9/11 claims 9/11 Parable (a bank robbery) 9/11 Haiku unanswered questions 9/11 paradigms: LIHOP, MIHOP, hijacking the hijackers theory Anthrax attacks after 9/11 Participants
Warnings and Wargames
Military / Intel War Games on 9/11
NRO plane into bldg exercise NSA & 9/11 Air Force Stand Down Suppressed Warnings Able Danger: Defense Intelligence tracked the terrorists before 9/11 Bush reads "The Pet Goat" 9/11 Paradigms: LIHOP, MIHOP, Hijacking the Hijackers theory Remote Controlled Boeings robot war tech Motive: Peak Oil Wars
9/11 Truth Resources
All Wars Need a Pretext
Media 9/11 Strategy
Left Gatekeepers
Alt. Media Stand Down
Limited Hang Outs Denial is not a River in Egypt The Nation / David Corn FAIR / Norman Solomon Chip Berlet Democracy Now! Noam Chomsky Michael Moore Mother Jones Ward Churchill Counterpunch Alternative Radio Greg Palast Inter Press Service Institute for Policy Studies MoveOn.org Larry Bensky Rolling Stone David Rovics Conspiracy Gatekeepers
"Pentagon Missile" Hoax
Other "No Planes" Hoaxes
Similar Disinfo Sabotage
Demolition Theories
World War IV
Operation Iraqi Liberation OIL
War of Terror battlefields
War Crimes
Media Manipulation
Media manipulation: the
best disinformation is mostly correct -- "bait" make lies
easier to believe
Media is Big Business Media Wars: murdered journalists Psychological Operations Jeff Gannon: media whore Internet Issues
Reliable News
Homeland Security
Restoring civil liberties
would require exposing 9/11: the pretext for the war on freedom
Homeland Security USA PATRIOT Act Total Information Awareness Peak Fascism: Peak Oil, Climate Change, Civil Liberties Red Alert: partial martial law Detention Without Trial Green Fascism: Guantanamo is Wind Powered September 11, 1984 Terry Gilliam's BRAZIL
Fake Elections: Deep Politics
JFK - MLK - RFK - Wellstone
American Coup: Plane Crashes and Lone Gunmen
JFK: November 22, 1963 JFK Truth Movement JFK and the Moon Race JFK and the Unspeakable MLK: A Martyr for Peace RFK: Not Allowed to Win Wellstone's Plane Crash Anthrax Attacks Watergate: A Right Wing Coup President Jimmy Carter 1980 October Surprise Cynthia McKinney COINTELPRO Pope John Paul I Beyond Bush
Truth & Reconciliation Commission for US Empire
Beyond Bush: Regime Rotation Joe Biden's plan to partition Iraq Barack Hussein Obama Clinton Bush connections JFK: November 22, 1963 MLK: Martyr for Peace Carter: the missed opportunity Zbignew Brzezinski's warning not to attack Iran Method to their Madness November Surprise 2006: elites wanted Democrats to win Presidents & Vice Presidents
Bush Crime Family
Bill and Hillary Clinton
Election Fraud
2008
|
Norman Solomon last updated: May 9, 2008 Norman Solomon is director of the Institute for Public Accuracy:
If the IPA talked about Peak Oil in detail they might have a harder time getting funded by Ford and Rockefeller. A few months ago, when Mr. Solomon was in Eugene to preach to the choir, he was asked after his presentation to talk about the core issue of Peak Oil in relation to the War on Iraq. His reply was to ask the questioner if he knew this writer (Mark Robinowitz) but did not provide a substantive answer, according to the questioner. If Senator Obama is allowed to become the next Emperor it is unlikely that foundation funded "peace activists" will demand accountability for the politician that they supported. An honest examination would point out that Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obama's foreign policy advisor, helped set the stage for the War on Iraq through creation of the Rapid Deployment Force, which is now called Central Command (CENTCOM), the military command that has shattered Iraq. Brzezinski predicted in his 1997 book that the next war (ie. the current situation) would be to control Asian energy resources, concluding that
and a commentary published a month after 9/11 (which Norman Solomon attacked as "not credible")
The "Institute for Public Accuracy" (sic) which Mr. Solomon runs does not seem interested in Peak Oil, the reason for the War on Iraq. A search for "peak oil" at the IPA website (accuracy.org) found only one mention in all of their many years of weekly press releases (and it was buried deep in the press release, not the topic of the release). None of the leading experts on Peak Oil can be found using their search engine - "accuracy.org" does not mention of Richard Heinberg, Julian Darley, the Association for the Study of Peak Oil, Post Carbon Institute, James Howard Kunstler, Colin Campbell, Ken Deffeyes, et al. Of course, this censorship of the obvious is shared by most of the foundation funded liberal "alternative" media, it is the "alternative" form of "pack journalism." You would think that given the fact we have reached Peak Oil they might have a tiny interest in promoting someone who has a liberal / progressive / environmental / social justice oriented perspective on Peak Oil. It would be interesting to ask the IPA why they ignore this in their media outreach work. You can read more about Peak Oil in the mainstream media than in most of the so-called alternative media, although neither flavor of media talks about how Peak Oil is the real motivation for the seizure of the Iraqi oil fields. It's understandable that the IPA attacked journalists who dared to point out that 9/11 was deliberately allowed to happen, since the implication of this inconvenient truth is too scary to acknowledge for most people (although the motive for allowing 9/11 was primarily Peak Oil). However, Peak Oil has more tolerance in the media as a topic that is not forbidden (as long as you don't point out that it was Cheney's real motivation for attacking Iraq). Even National Geographic ran a cover story on this (May 2004) that was excellent, although it didn't talk about the deeper politics involved.
A press release last week on the issue of gas prices completely ignored peak oil:
As always, I hope to be wrong in my cynicism and that the IPA will explain why they haven't covered the story - and will make amends by urging their media lists to interview Peak Oil experts. a previous message about IPA's attack on pointing out the excuse for the War on Iraq: IPA is run by Norman Solomon, a long time liberal analyst and activist. He was at the core of a coordinated effort of alternative liberal media to discredit Ruppert's work (and by extension, all those who are 911 skeptics). An October 2003 Oregon Peace Worker editorial by Solomon was very shrewd disinformation. He pointed out (accurately) how Bush used 9/11 to promote various nefarious agendas, while carefully excising any hint that 9/11 might have been allowed to happen in order to ensure those agendas (which there is tremendous amount of evidence for). It's a classic case of carefully constructing the realms of "reasonable dissent" that obfuscates as much as it enlightens. "Left" commentator and peace advocate Norman Solomon, who traveled to Iraq with a conservative Democrat on an official State Department sanctioned trip, hasn't been persecuted like the peace activists who went to Iraq just before the war without State Department permission. Perhaps it was a reward for his participation in the campaign by "left gatekeepers" to attack journalists and advocates who questioned Bush's statements about 9/11. U.S. TO PERSECUTE PEACE ACTIVISTS (but not those who supported Bush's
view on 9/11 at a critical time)
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting Solomon is an associate with the group "FAIR," which has monitored media bias since the 1980s. FAIR's work has generally been very good, although media ownership has concentrated much more during this time. FAIR's founder, Jeff Cohen, is now communications director for the Kucinich Presidential campaign (the only candidate who supports lowering Bush's military budget). However, on the 911 issue, FAIR is providing tacit support to the Bush administration by trying to get liberals to back away from the independent investigations. Last year, Solomon and FAIR pressured Pacifica Radio / KPFA (in Berkeley) to get them to ban Ruppert from their airwaves. In response, Pacifica journalist Kelia Ramares wrote Solomon and FAIR's Steve Rendall to say "You are leveraging your reputation in the community to commit character assassination against Ruppert, knowing it is highly unlikely anyone will call you on it." Rendell claimed in the Boston Globe (7/10/03) that Ruppert is "circulating unsupported conspiracy theories [that] detracts from the debate."
This exchange suggests that FAIR has some explaining to do -- why are they lying about "unsupported" lack of evidence when they won't even touch the evidence that has been exposed? Do they really want to support the official, Bush regime view, despite the flagrant evidence pointing out it is a fraud? Why are they unwilling to do their own research into 9/11 if they disagree with Michael Ruppert or other journalists investigating the stories? FAIR has not looked at the issues surrounding the "standdown" of the Air Force. A September, 2003 article by Seth Ackerman, a contributing writer to FAIR, focused on the "intelligence failures" of 9/11 and how the Saudi hijackers were able to bypass US intelligence. He concluded that the "incompetence" theory was plausible, and "it ought to be possible to steer a middle course between wild speculation and cynical whitewash." While it's obvious that the Saudis played a role -- they've supported US terror in Nicaragua, Lebanon and Afghanistan -- they weren't in charge of air defense over Washington and New York. Perhaps their role was similar to the Mafia in Dallas in 1963, a subcontractor who helped with some technical aspects, but they weren't in charge of the main event, nor running the coverup afterwards. A decade and a half of pointing out how many times Henry Kissinger and other warmongers are on network TV hasn't succeeded in slowing the concentration of media ownership. Perhaps it is past time for FAIR to think clearly about the modus operandi of the empire, rather than waste time attacking those who dare to probe. The Institute for Public Accuracy, FAIR, etc. have not done anything to reinforce the demands of relatives like Kristen Breitweiser to have a genuine investigation.
Pacifica Radio / KPFA journalist replies to Norman Solomon's attacks on Mike Ruppert
David Zupan and the Northwest Media Project (Zupan is an employee of Norman Solomon's Institute for Public Accuracy) In August, 2003, the "Peace and Justice Conference Committee" engaged in a blatant act of censorship to exclude dissident voices about the "War on Terror" from the annual peace and justice conference held at the University of Oregon, organized in part by Mr. Zupan. A majority of participants in the organizing meetings wanted Michael Ruppert as a keynote speaker, given the amazing work that he and his publication "From the Wilderness" (www.fromthewilderness.com) have done, especially since Sept 11. FTW was the first publication to link the "insider trading" scandals on United and American (the week before 9/11) back to the CIA. FTW compiled some of the most detailed knowledge regarding proof of Bush administration prior knowledge of 9/11. FTW has done some of the best work on the "stand down" of the Air Force on 9/11, the relationship of the peak of oil production to 9/11 and the "War on Terror," and has been proven correct in its predictions on numerous occasions. At an organizers meeting on August 4, 2003 that had 12 participants, 2/3rds of those there wanted to have Ruppert speak at the conference. The two co-coordinators, David Zupan and Michael Carrigan, forbid any decision from being made that day, ostensibly because "more information" was needed. (In reality, there was plenty of information already available in terms of cost, availability, and political correctness - the latter was the real issue.) Instead, the decision was delayed again (it had dragged on for weeks) until the following week, when five participants were at the meeting, and then a decision was made to exclude Mike Ruppert from the conference (and three of those participants were paid to work on the conference). The one volunteer who voted against Ruppert's appearance said afterwards that he agreed that there was a "stand down" of the Air Force on 9/11 -- and was shocked to realize that he had just voted against bringing one of the leading experts on this, he was going solely on the unsubstantiated claims that "Ruppert isn't credible" that were uttered repeatedly as a mantra to confuse and distract. The conference did not invite any speakers who exposed the 9/11 scandal. It did have some bland, liberal comedian commentators (Jim Hightower and Molly Ivins) who were very popular but didn't really say anything new. It was another case of preaching to the choir, but it would be difficult to find any concrete result that came from their appearance (other than their speaker fees). During the questions of Hightower, a woman asked him about the Carlyle Group (private investment firm that the Bush and Bin Ladens were partners in - a firm heavily invested in weapons) and he didn't really have any reply for her. The culture of celebrity is dominant on what's left of the "Left" -- and while it can be entertaining to see famous liberals on their 70 city book tours (in most cases, these books have precious little to say that isn't already said elsewhere), it is hard to see any tangible ways that this translates into political change. Unfortunately, Ruppert's success brought attacks -- and the foundation funded "gatekeepers" of the liberal left zeroed in on Ruppert's work in early 2002, just as the "Bush Knew" material was getting more attention. Norman Solomon of the Institute for Public "Accuracy" (former employer of Mr Zupan) and David Corn (The Nation) were particularly aggressive in smearing Ruppert -- and by extension, anyone who dared to suggest that 9/11 was not a "surprise attack." Corn in particular has a LONG history of whitewashing official crimes under the guise of exposing them -- in particular, was a leading critic of journalists exposing the CIA / cocaine connections, connections that the CIA itself has admitted to. The Nation magazine has been perhaps the leading defender of the "Warren Commission" on the "left," so it is not surprising that they have been part of the 9/11 coverup, too. Mr. Zupan has declined several requests for a public debate on whether peace advocates should talk about the topic of Bush's complicity in 9/11. Surely, if he is so adamant against this being discussed, he should be willing to participate in a debate with those who want to expose it. He has also declined to explain why he was so willing to denigrate Ruppert as "not credible" without having even read his material (at the first volunteers meeting where this came up, he said that Ruppert wasn't credible - and when asked by several people to justify his statement he was unable to cite any details - it was embarrassing). We will never know if the peace movement would have been much stronger if these "left gatekeepers" had instead worked to amplify the evidence of Bush's 9/11 complicity instead of suppressing it. But it is reasonable to assume that if these facts have been much more widespread in the public consciousness Bush would have had much more difficulty in gaining political support for the invasion of Iraq -- indeed, he might have been impeached and jailed by now. Why did The Nation and Norman Solomon work so hard to muzzle this material - and why are they now silent about this? Most Americans will be relatively indifferent to the slaughter of millions
of people in distant lands. Vietnamese. Iraqis. Central Americans. But
a government that allows to be killed -- or directly kills -- three thousand
people in New York, almost no one in our country would tolerate this. The slogan "Justice Not War" as used by the "Justice Not War coalition" is an intriguing one, since it implies that "we were attacked but we want Justice not war."
ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP: Part 2: FAIR / COUNTERSPIN / INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY
|