Free Energy?
secret
suppressed technology or hoaxes?
a permaculture view of claims
for "zero point energy" and cold fusion
 
Some of the claims for "free
energy" may be true, some may not be -- this website does NOT vouch
for their accuracy, these links are provided to stimulate discussion and
perhaps point in directions that may turn out to be useful. Whether
these sorts of claims have validity or not is beyond our technical expertise
to verify ... especially since there seems to be even more disinformation
surrounding these topics than the 9/11 complicity scandal. Perhaps all
of these claims are merely wishful thinking. Perhaps there are real technologies
that their guardians mask with lots of lies. oilempire.us does not make
any claims pro or con for "free energy" systems.
Even if zero point, antigravity and/or
cold fusion (or similar technologies) turn out to be commercially viable
and are implemented in a large enough scale to compensate for declining
fossil fuel supplies, it seems obvious that we will also need to learn
to temper our overconsumption of minerals, water, forests, fisheries and
other natural resources in order to maintain a balanced biosphere that
supports human (and non-human) life into the indefinite future. One scientist
at the September 2004 "New Energy Movement" conference in Portland,
Oregon who claims to have worked with viable free energy technologies
admits that even if every home in North America
(and the other continents) had a viable zero point energy device to safely
generate electricity, we would still need to tear up parking lots to grow
food for the future.
Perhaps if these technologies are real
they are in a similar condition to the status of nuclear technology after
Albert Einstein postulated the theory of relativity in 1905. Nuclear power
and weapons were obvious from the equations that he offered. In 1914,
H. G. Wells wrote a book titled "The World Set Free" which predicted
a nuclear war followed by a period of world peace (from a shocked humanity
vowing never to wage war again). Wells knew that nuclear weapons were
obviously possible following Einstein's equations, but it wasn't until
the early 1940s that anyone figured out exactly how this would be done
(with the explosion over Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, the largest simultaneous
slaughter in human history).
The Hunt for Zero Point by Nick Cook, a writer for Jane's (one of the planet's premier publications about military topics) suggests
that the idea that zero point energy / antigravity systems were taken
from extraterrestrial sources may be a form of disinformation to cover
up the reality of this technological development. If zero point / anti-gravity
is real, and it was developed without "alien" technologies,
then claiming that it was taken from crashed alien vehicles would be a
great way of discouraging further interest by most people into the topic.
We've already had a disastrous experience with "free energy"
(abundant oil)
The claim for "free energy" systems is that they generate
more usable energy as an output than is put into the device. Some of the
claims argue that this is not a violation of the laws of thermodynamics
(which apparently prohibit perpetual motion machines and other "over
unity" devices), since the energy is merely being tapped from natural
sources not currently accepted as valid or accessible by modern science.
(This is a description that does not do justice to the various arguments.)
But humanity has already had an analogous experience with "free
energy" -- the century and a half of using petroleum and other fossil
fuels. In the early days of oil, for every one barrel of oil used to extract
and process petroleum, up to 100 barrels of oil was made available for
use. This is a form of an "over unity" energy system (if you
ignore the finite nature of the easily accessible oil deposits).
Unfortunately, this experience with cheap and available energy
supplies (oil, coal, natural gas) suggests that the social impact of commercial
deployment of a "free energy" system (assuming that can be done)
would be to continue our current destructive over-consumptive behaviors
that are destablizing Earth's biosphere. Widely available free energy
would be much more likely to extract more oil, mine more minerals, clearcut
more remote forests, catch the last fish, and other forms of accelerating
the depletion of the natural world. In the longer term, free energy systems
would also remove the power currently invested in the petroleum paradigm,
which is perhaps the most powerful industry on the planet.
In addition, some free energy advocates
state that these technologies would have dangerous weapons applications
(one of the reasons they are allegedly suppressed) and
therefore are unlikely to be declassified and implemented widely until
humanity has a change of consciousness toward cooperation instead
of competition. Furthermore, these technologies would decentralize energy
production, which would then decentralize political and economic power,
making North America, Western Europe, and Japan merely a part of the human
race, instead of the dominant powers running the planet.
Matt Savinar, "The Oil Age is Over"
While free energy technologies such as Cold Fusion, Vacuum Energy and
Zero Point Energy are extremely fascinating, the unfortunate reality
is that they are unlikely to help us cope with the oil depletion ...
We’ve already had our experiment with "free energy."
With an EROEI [Energy Return of Energy Invested] of 30 to 1, oil was
so efficient and cheap an energy source that it was practically free.
In some locations, such as Louisiana, oil had an EROEI of 100 to 1!
The development of a "free energy" device would just put
off the inevitable. The Earth has a carrying capacity. If we are able
to substitute a significant portion of our fossil fuel usage with "free
energy," the crash would just come at a later time, when we have
depleted a different resource. At that point, our population will be
even higher. The higher a population is, the further it has to fall
when it depletes a key resource. The further it has to fall, the more
momentum it picks up on the way down through war and disease. By encouraging
continued population growth, so-called free energy could actually maker
our situation drastically worse.
One can only wonder what damage we would do to ourselves if given access
to free energy. We discovered oil, an amazingly powerful source of energy,
and 150 years later we are closer to destroying ourselves than ever
before. What do you think we will do to ourselves if we gain access
to an even more powerful source of energy?
Another analogy may be useful here: say you give a young man access
to a one-million-dollar bank account on his 18 th birthday. Do you think
he is going to handle it responsibly? My guess is no. If he’s
anything like I was at 18 (or even today), he’s going to blow
it all on expensive liquor, wild strippers, and fast cars.
In other words, he’s going to consume and screw himself into
oblivion, which is exactly what the human race has been doing to itself
since discovering oil. What do you think will happen if, upon depleting
his one-milliondollar bank account, the young man gains access a bank
account with one-billion-dollars in it? Most likely, he will continue
consuming and screwing until he completely destroys himself and all
those around him.
We will likely do the same thing if we ever gain access to an energy
source even more abundant and powerful than oil.
http://rigint.blogspot.com/2006/11/back-to-wilderness.html#comments
Free energy - or even very cheap energy - is a nighmare.
Imagine that tomorrow, we would have a mysterious ‘free’ energy
source that would not emit CO2 or anything else noxious. Fine.
Then what? What would it be used for? To drive more cars, build more roads,
drive more tractors, send ships chugging, space rockets? Build more and
more houses? Light up concrete block cities, a blaze in the night? Create
more lethal arms, make millions of tanks?
Where would the primary materials - fertile soil, water, the greenery,
earth that supports food production; oceans with their fish proteins;
minerals such as copper, uranium, and so on - oil itself, present in thousands
of prducts - come from?
All these are not inexhaustible either. In fact many are scarce today.
Presumably, they would not be provided along with the ‘free energy’
package.
One can’t drive about in a powerful sports car if the people who
make it starve and if the earth can’t manage to provide the materials
necessary for the building of it, such as minerals and oil, to make plastic
etc.
Free energy would turn the world into a wasteland, immediately. Some might
argue that is already a done deal.
Sheila
Ian Woofenden, "Free Energy: Not Pie on the Plate"
Home Power magazine, October - November 2004, p. 118
renewable energy can be considered "free," but only once
you pay for it. The equipment to harvest the renewable energy found
in sunshine, wind, and falling water costs money, and so does maintaining
the systems. You can pay for it up front, and it's a great deal, but
it's not "free."
"Free energy" advocates generally aren't referring to photovoltaic
(PV) panels or wind generators. They talk about energy from magnets,
energy from space, and energy from black boxes that are too secret for
us to get a look into ...
I'm a skeptic and a realist. My job asks me to look critically at text,
and my conscience asks me to carefully examine claims about any new
energy-producing device.
At the same time, I try to remain open to new ideas. PVs once were
new, and folks were skeptical about them -- some still remain skeptical
today. We have to find a balance between skepticism and openness. Just
don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out.
The promoters of free-energy devices must prove themselves ...
I'll be first in line to purchase new, clean-energy technologies that
actually work. But I'll remain skeptical of all schemes and scams that
aren't functioning products for sale, or at least ready to be tested
in independent circumstances. Until then, these free-energy dreams are
just more pie in the sky. And as HP publisher Richard Perez says, "We
report only about pie on the plate..."
www.infinite-energy.com
Infinite Energy magazine, founded by MIT physicist and cold-fusion researcher
Eugene Mallove, who was murdered in 2004
www.newenergymovement.org
New Energy Movement sponsored a conference on these technologies in Portland,
Oregon in September 2004
This site
www.pureenergysystems.com/events/conferences/2004/NewEnergyMovement/
has links to the presentations.
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/things-to-come-merlin-project.html
www.space.com/businesstechnology/flying_triangle_040902.html
Mainstream news source talks about apparent anti-gravity aircraft.
www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/classified_aircraft_010815-1.html
www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/classified_aircraft_010815-2.html
"UFOs and Classified Aircraft: Shedding New Light on Dark Secrets"
www.realhistoryarchives.com/collections/science/antigravity.htm
Antigravity
Like cold fusion, antigravity is considered by some to be a "fringe"
science that no serious physicist would investigate. But there have been
several recent experiments that show that electromagnetic fields due have
an effect with respect to gravity, and that such a force can be used to
create anti-gravity devices. Also like cold fusion, this science is still
very much in its infancy. Or so we've been told. In Nick Cook's
book (The Hunt for Zero Point) the case is made strongly that the American
government has long been in the business of antigravity research and has
likely had successes in that regard. That would explain why it
is put down in the media, which is so completely government reliant. If
the technology is real, keeping it secret gives the American military
a distinct advantage over other military forces. Read and decide for yourself
what the real history of this scientific subject reveals!
The term "electrogravitics" is often used instead of antigravity
to describe the same areas of research. Bear that in mind when searching
for information on this subject.
Tesla and other scientists of his time postulated an "ether"
that was filled with energy. Modern science has found evidence of this,
and calls it "zero point energy." Because electromagnetic
generation sufficient to shield an object from gravity takes an extraordinary
amount of energy, the hunt for antigravity is tied into the hunt for a
limitless supply of energy. If we could pull energy directly
from air and space, we would have that unlimited source of energy necessary
to make possible the commercial development of antigravity devices.
Links
• The
Antigravity Underground
• American
Antigravity
• Electrogravitics
Systems
• "ELECTROGRAVITICS
SYSTEMS" - The Declassified Report (from 1956)
• Antigravity?
Well, it's all up in the air. It sounds like something from the X-Files,
but levitation is raising eyebrows--and interest at NASA. (Business
Week article, July 1997)
Books
• The Hunt for Zero Point: Inside the Classified World
of Antigravity Technology, by Nick Cook, Broadway Books; (August
13, 2002)
• Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology,
by Thomas Valone, Integrity Research Inst; 2nd edition (November 1995)
www.realhistoryarchives.com/collections/science/coldfusion.htm
Cold Fusion
"The basic idea here is that we're at the stage of the transistor
like in the period 1947 through 1950 or so when, yes, the phenomenon was
there, it was weak, disputed. It was problematic but eventually it overcame
those things and is pervasive."
-- Dr. Eugene Mallove, with
science degrees from MIT and Harvard; author of Fire from Ice: Searching
for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor.
It bears mentioning that there is a history of new science being put
down and discredited, only to have it proven true. Nikola Tesla was told
that alternating current would break the laws of nature and was therefore
impossible. But today, the world is powered by alternating current.
And we all know what happened to Copernicus and Galileo. This appears
to be the latest round of something new that threatens our understanding
of the world (not to mention the oil-based power structure) and is therefore
looked upon with a high level of skepticism. But to those who take the
time to investigate, cold fusion continues to show promise as an alternative
energy source.
Links relating to this controversy:
Books on Cold Fusion:
• Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed, Charles Beaudette,
Oak Grove Press (2nd ed.) May 2002
• Nuclear Transmutation: The Reality of Cold Fusion, by by Tadahiko
Mizuno, Jed Rothwell (Translator), Eugene Mallove (Foreword), Infinite
Energy Press; (December 1, 1998
www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html
June 06, 2005
Coming in out of the cold: Cold fusion, for real
By Michelle Thaller | csmonitor.com
... A very reputable, very careful group of scientists at the University
of Los Angeles (Brian Naranjo, Jim Gimzewski, Seth Putterman) has initiated
a fusion reaction using a laboratory device that's not much bigger than
a breadbox, and works at roughly room temperature. This time, it looks
like the real thing.
... For the time being, don't expect fusion to become a readily available
energy option. The current cold fusion apparatus still takes
much more energy to start up than you get back out, and it may never
end up breaking even. In the mean time, the crystal-fusion
device might be used as a compact source of neutrons and X-rays, something
that could turn out to be useful making small scanning machines. But
it really may not be long until we have the first nuclear fusion-powered
devices in common use.
Unrecognized Fascist Observatories (UFO)
www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/links.html
Subject: DoD Films: Part 5 - Flying Disk Aircraft Programs
3 Feb 2002
I have long contended that "UFO's" are really terrestrial
craft, developed by Nazi scientists first in WWII, and used but kept
secret by the US when they were brought here and to Canada to continue
their work. I call them Unrecognized Fascist Observatories, and they
are part of what I call hidden technology. William S. Burroughs
said, "If this was the middle ages and Magellan was an American,
and he discovered that the world was round not flat, we wouldn't tell
anyone so we could attack from the rear." That's the mentality.
Anyway, here is a list of unclassified (much more is not) DOD films
of flying discs, including the Avrocar model. We are supposed to think
they are either swamp gas reflections or men from Mars. When I studied
the reports in the Pentagon library, though, they were coming in and
out of military bases in most situations. Does this mean there is not
intelligent life on other planets? I hope not, having found so little
here. It just means that "flying saucers" are not evidence
of their existence, and that "alien abductions" are not likely.
After all, if you are smart enough to cross interstellar space to get
here, wouldn't you be smart enough to turn around?
-- John Judge
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2006/02/gods-must-be-crazy.html#comments
Pissedoffcabbie said...
If Jimmy Carter had gotten all the way to the inner core of the UFO
phenomena, he would know that a grand hoax had been devised to hide
exotic technology from the public. Yes, there are gravity-defeating
craft, but, no, they are not manned by aliens.
Victor Schauberger and the Horton Brothers get most of the credit for
the birth of this technology. As for the present, see the Gruman TR-3B.
One of the chief architects for the grand hoax was Laurance Rockefeller.
He gave millions to the likes of Dr. John Mack, the Harvard alien abduction
researcher, and other UFO research groups. But, I think the hoax goes
beyond providing a cover for hidden technology, and the larger goal
for Mr. Rockefeller was to create a new religion. His library, housed
at the California Institute for Integral Studies in San Francisco, is
a clearing house for occultic literature. A considerable amount of Rockefeller
money has been pipelined to the New Age.
The UFO psy-ops has given way to climate change as a means to herd us
into a New World Order. Having out-lived their usefulness, UFOs are
fading into the background of the cyberworld. The world has moved on
without Laurance Rockefeller, and his ambitious plan to re-direct our
spiritual leanings.
Whether this is true or not (the "Hunt for Zero Point" book
makes a similar conclusion), this claim has also been polluted by ridiculous
nonsense from hoaxers. Semi-famous neo-Nazi Ernst Zundel claims that the
Nazis (original) developed flying disks and now have an Antarctic base
to fly them from. www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/z/zundel-ernst/flying-saucers/
has links to this absurdity, which is entertaining from a psychiatric
perspective.
www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/28/1043534050248.html?oneclick=true
Anti-gravity and us
January 28, 2003
Webdiarist Malcolm Street has a unique theory on why Britain and Australia
are backing Bush on Iraq. Welcome to the anti-gravity arms race.
Australia, the UK, anti-gravity and the Iraq crisis
by Malcolm Street, Canberra
Are you sitting down? Good, because this is going to blow your mind.
This item is going to sound like a bad reject from conspiracy publications
like Nexus or New Dawn, or an X-Files fanzine. It isn't. The indisputable
fact is that both the US and the UK are putting serious money into anti-gravity
research with military aerospace applications. The only question is
how far it is from operational status. There is informed speculation
that it is already used in the American B2 bomber.
I believe that access to this potentially revolutionary and obviously
highly secret technology, perhaps via the JSF/F35 fighter program, could
be behind the otherwise (in my view) inexplicable level of support given
Bush over Iraq by Howard and Blair.
For the record I am a mechanical engineer who spent over two years
at a British Aerospace guided missile R&D site in the early 1980s
and have continued to take a strong interest in aerospace technology.
I am a member of ASRI (Australian Space Research Institute). I am not
a crank.
The most puzzling aspect to me of the American obsession with invading
Iraq even without UN sanction is the continuing support provided by
Tony Blair and John Howard. The USA's reason is obvious; to gain control
of a major oil supply as insurance against increasing instability in
Saudi Arabia. (If it's about human rights and weapons of mass destruction,
why the kid gloves treatment of North Korea?)
One could stretch to say that Blair has the interests of BP and the
half-British Shell oil companies, but if it comes to a vote in the Commons
he could well be rolled. However nothing apart from blind loyalty seems
to explain the support given by Australia, and even with a conservative
government there are rumblings from Howard's back benches and a population
largely opposed.
So why are Blair and Howard, both consumate political operators, taking
such a huge political risk for a war that no-one but the Americans want,
which could destroy the structure of international law and result in
both the UK and Australia becoming international pariahs?
My hypothesis is the supply of information from the United States
that is so secret it is only known to the very highest levels of government
and is of such strategic importance that it is worth taking such risks.
My initial thoughts were that the US was blackmailing both leaders
over continued supply of intelligence information gained from the Echelon
system via the UKASA agreement. But that could have been done at any
time over the last couple of decades. However, the current timescale
however coincides interestingly with the crucial development phase of
the F35/JSF fighter aircraft program...
The JSF (Joint Strike Fighter), which is front-runner to replace the
RAAF's F-18s and F-111s in what would be our largest ever defence order,
is quite unlike any previous supersonic US fighter project available
for foreign allies. Unlike the earlier F104 Starfighter and F16 Falcon
programs, there will be no generalised offset agreements, by which foreign
manufacturers will be able to supply components to the whole program.
Technology transfer in the JSF will be very tightly controlled, with
only the UK (developing a version to replace the Harrier jump-jet) so
far as an inner partner.
Australia is trying hard to get on board, with (according to a local
TV news item some months ago) three firms in Canberra alone tendering
for parts of the project.
There is a precedent for Australia sucking up to a larger power in
the hopes of gaining access to its advanced weapons technology; the
agreement given to conduct British nuclear tests on Australian territory
in the 1950s in the hope of getting transfers of British atomic bomb
technology. (See Dr Wayne Reynolds' book "Australia's bid for the
Atomic Bomb"). In turn a major theme of this book is the use the
UK made of its own program as a bargaining chip to get access to US
atomic technology.
The July 2002 issue of the British magazine Air International
had an article entitled "JSF UK - more than just an aircraft"
by one Robert Hewson which deals with the JSF program, particularly
the extensive participation of British companies (notably BAe Systems
and Rolls-Royce) in its development:
"One reason the US is keeping such a tight hold over the
industrial elements of the JSF is the thorny issue of "stealth"
and how to control access to the classified stealth technologies which
are built into every aspect of the JSF design. The US and UK have a
special (and classified) agreement that allows the two countries to
share data on common stealth research, but all other discussion of the
subject is closed. The question of how the US will supply this sensitive
set of technologies to other JSF customers goes unanswered - but the
underlying message is that the US is reluctant to do so and that somehow
there will be different standards in JSF "stealthiness" between
friends, good friends and others."
So we know there is a sweetheart classified deal between the US and
UK over stealth technology in the JSF, and that apparently the full
stealth technology will not be supplied to outside customers. Why couldn't
it cover other highly classified technology as well? What if this other
US-UK technology was so revolutionary that the inner partners' versions
of the JSF would have a massive advantage over anything else in the
air for years to come, something that could give them a colossal and
unassailable strategic advantage, as great as, perhaps, the atomic bomb?
There is such a technology on the horizon: anti-gravity. Yes you read
that right! Both the US and UK are publicly running research programs
investigating anti-gravity under such headings as "propellantless
propulsion". The UK effort, run by BAe Systems, is called Project
Greenglow (see bbc
for an overview), while in the US Boeing is running an anti-gravity
program in its Phantom Works (Boeing's equivalent of Lockheed's legendary
Skunk Works) in Seattle (see janes).
In addition, NASA is looking into overlapping areas under the "Breakthrough
Propulsion Physics" project (home page nasa).
(An interesting selection of links on anti-gravity links, albeit with
the odd crank, can be found at eskimo).
How far away is anti-gravity technology? It may already be operating...
Towards the end of an otherwise routine article on aircraft propulsion
in Air International in January 2000, reprinted at aeronautics,
well-known and highly respected aviation writer Bill Gunston speculated
that the American Northrop B-2 Spirit heavy bomber already uses some
form of anti-gravity technology:
"I have numerous documents, all published openly in the United
States, which purport to explain how the B-2 is even stranger - far,
far stranger - than it appears. Most are articles published in commercial
magazines, some are openly published US Patents, while a few are open
USAF publications by Wright Aeronautical Laboratory and Air Force Systems
Command's Astronautics Laboratory. They deal with such topics as electric-field
propulsion, and electrogravitics (or anti-gravity), the transient alteration
of not only thrust but also a body's weight. Sci-Fi has nothing on this
stuff."
What really put the cat among the proverbial pigeons was a feature
published in a March 1992 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology,
entitled "Black world engineers, scientists, encourage using highly
classified technology for civil applications". For the first time
in open literature, this article explained how the B-2's sharp leading
edge is charged to "many millions of volts", while the corresponding
negative charge is blown out in the jets from the four engines.
"Take-off thrust of the [B2 engine] F118- 100 at sea level
is given as '19,000lb (84.5kN) class' by Northrop Grumman and as '17,300lb
(77.0kN)' by the USAF. These are startlingly low figures for an aircraft
whose take-off weight is said to be 336,5001b (152,635kg) and which
was until recently said to weigh 376,0001b (170,550kg). Aircraft usually
get heavier over the years, not 20 tones [sic] lighter. Even at the
supposed reduced weight, the ratio of thrust to weight is a mere 0.2,
an extraordinarily low value for a combat aircraft."
In other words, Gunston is implying that the B2 is seriously underpowered
unless there is some means of reducing its mass or
of increasing its lift beyond that provided by conventional aerodynamic
means.
"Other writers have commented on the size of the B-2 wing
and noted that its stealth depends on the huge black skin being made
of RAM (radar-absorbent material). This, say the physicists, is 'a high-k,
high-density dielectric ceramic, capable of generating an enormous electrogravitic
lift force when charged'."
So is this why the B2s cost US$1 billion each?
Gunston's article is controversial, (an interesting discussion on
it in the rec.aviation.military Internet newsgroup is archived at google
under the title "B-2A and electrogravity") but there is a
precedent for a radical, cost-is-no-object, highly classified US military
aircraft using two major sets of new technologies, one secret and the
other VERY secret.
The legendary Lockheed A12/SR71 "Blackbird" reconnaissance
aircraft was increasingly declassified in the late 70s/early 80s, with
major details released on the structural and propulsion technologies
that enabled that incredible aircraft, one of the great masterpieces
of aeronautical engineering, to cruise at Mach 3. What wasn't declassified
until several years later, long after the F117 stealth fighter had been
unveiled, was the fact that it was also a stealth design!
While stealth took second place to speed, the fact was that stealth
elements were a major factor in the airframe configuration, design of
which dated back to the late 1950s, twenty years before
stealth technology was even mentioned by the US government.
Another example is the even more legendary North American P-51 Mustang
fighter of World War 2. For years its outstanding performance was explained
by its "laminar flow" wing technology (also used in the B24
Liberator bomber).
Shortly before former senior manager and engineer at North American
Aviation, Lee Atwood, died a few years ago he wrote articles for a couple
of aircraft magazines (see, for example, airspacemag)
giving the real explanation. Using a phenomenon known as the "Meredith
Effect", the Mustang's characteristic under-fuselage duct for the
engine's radiator was so shaped internally that the heat from the radiator
converted it into, effectively, a low-temperature ramjet, thrust from
which at high speeds offset most of the drag produced by the radiator
in the first place! Not even the servicing crews knew that this was
the true function of the duct design!
We know that the JSF/F35 will incorporate a high degree of stealth,
like the B-2, with the degree of stealth apparently varying between
inner and outer customers. However, stealth is relatively old-hat; the
F117, the first stealth aircraft, turns up regularly at air shows, much
of the US 70s and 80s stealth program has been declassified and the
general principles, if not specific applications, of stealth technology
are now well-known in the unclassified world. I can't see it being worth
risking the fall of the UK or Australian governments.
So are Howard and Blair playing a very high-stakes game to gain access
to a revolutionary military technology more secret, more important,
than stealth, one that's perhaps being pioneered on the US-only B-2?
Like anti-gravity technology only available to the select inner partners
of the JSF/F35 program? And has the US threatened to boot them out if
they don't toe the Bush line on Iraq?
www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw020729_1_n.shtml
Anti-gravity propulsion comes ‘out of the closet’
By Nick Cook, JDW Aerospace Consultant, London
Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted
it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn
a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science
underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.
As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom
Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company
is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims
he has developed anti-gravity devices. So far, however, Boeing has fallen
foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the
exodus of Russian high technology to the West).
www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/gravity_research_020731.html
Boeing denies this claim ...
The "Disclosure
Project" claims that these technologies have an extraterrestrial
origin, that the secrets have been kept for more than a half century,
and they offer many former military and intelligence officers who testify
to the truths of these claims. Are these claims are authentic
or merely a very sophisticated psyop (psychological warfare operation)
effort to cover up terrestrial originated research into secret
technologies?
www.disclosureproject.org/ddt.htm
Decoy, Distract, Trash (DDT) is an article about how disinformation
campaigns by secret quasi-government organizations are used to discredit
government critics, truth seekers and other citizens who want greater
openness in the way the world is run.
DDT (Decoy, Distract and Trash)
by
Steven M. Greer M.D.
Director, The Disclosure Project
Copyright 2002
A former high official at the NSA (National Security Agency)
told me about a protocol informally dubbed DDT - that old poisonous
chemical long-banned in much of the world. In this application, it stands
for Decoy, Distract and Trash - which is what sophisticated intelligence
operatives use to set up some person or group, take them off the trail
of something real and important, and trash the person or the subject.
...
The Disclosure Project also sponsors Space Energy Access Systems
www.seaspower.com -- which despite several promises has not offered
any working prototypes for public scrutiny.
www.disclosureproject.org/Outsidethebox-TedLoderPaper.htm
a paper talking about anti-gravity research
www.disclosureproject.org/Transcripts/TranscriptCharlesGoyetteRadioShowInterview-DrStevenGreer-Feb252005.htm
we're estimating that between 1950 and 1960 they basically had figured
out the energy and propulsion generation systems behind these sorts
of objects. They realized that it extracts energy from the fabric of
space around us. Not outer space, but space. In fact, we have an experimental
program going on now called Space Energy Access Systems. You can see
the web site SEASpower.com to look into this. The question is, what
impact would that have? Well, essentially you're talking about things
with propulsion and energy generation capabilities that are not your
Grand Dad's Oldsmobile. These things are not moving through interstellar
space using Jet A fuel or rocket fuel, or anything like that. It's a
whole new type of physics, and the problem with it is that it means
'good bye' oil, gas, coal, centralized utilities...oops, I just wrote
off about a 6 or 7 trillion dollar part of the global economy. It is
an enormously big issue in terms of money, power, geopolitical power,
etc. So, this issue -- far from being the 'ha ha' piece of people having
sex with creatures from another star system -- is really about the death
grip the current power players have on the geopolitical order and the
economic order of this planet. And they damn well intend to keep us
addicted to black oil for as long as they can. The problem is, is that
many people even within this management group that I have met with,
and I *have* met with people who are on the policy board of this group,
are concerned that we *may* be running out of time to transition out
of fossil fuels, and so the good news is that many of them support bringing
this information out as well as the technologies out -- they just don't
know how to do it -- and they've painted themselves into such a corner
of secrecy, it's hard for them to even acknowledge that these projects
exist to the world because there would be so much outrage at the fact
that we have destroyed so much of the world's environment and impoverished
so much of the world artificially over the last 40 or 50 years.
www.stuffucanuse.com/topics/Anti_gravity.htm |
