50 shades of green: A Field Guide to Environmentalism
This is a partial guide to the environmental movement (a comprehensive examination would be extremely large). The topics and representatives for each point of view are selective, not exhaustive.
this page is under construction - Feb. 7, 2013
Thus, confronted by powerful corporate opposition, the environmental movement has split in two. The older national environmental organizations, in their Washington offices, have taken the soft path of negotiation, compromising with the corporations about how much pollution is acceptable ... The people living in the polluted communities have taken the hard path of confrontation ... The national organizations deal with the environmental disease by negotiating about the kind of 'Band-Aid' to apply to it; the community groups deal with the disease by trying to prevent it.
-- Barry Commoner, Making Peace With the Planet, p. 179
Eco
Issues |
Dominant Paradigm | Limited Hang Out | Ideal Direction | Disinformation |
| environmental philosophy | no problems that technology can't solve | "smart growth" environmental regulation maintain economic growth |
deep ecology steady state economics permaculture locally controlled organic agriculture production no jobs on a dead planet |
Earth Liberation Front (how much of this is sincere, and how much are agents provocateurs smearing the environmental movement?) Green Anarchy magazine (how many "cops are pigs" articles do we really need, anyway? and how does that bring about widespread support for social change?) hyper-factionalization (parodied by Monty Python's The Life of Brian) |
| environmental groups | Environmental Protection Agency and state government affiliates corporate polluters who pretend they are promoting "sustainability" (British Petroleum, Weyerhauser, Nike, among many others) |
corporate environmental groups that endorsed the 1993 NAFTA treaty
environmental groups that critique Republican destruction of the environment but stay silent on most Democratic destruction of the environment
An excellent review of the decline of the big green groups is Mark Dowie's book "Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century." |
Greenpeace (best of the large environmental groups) Rachel's environmental newsletter grassroots forest protection, zero discharge, environmental justice, freeway fighters, renewable energy installers, safe food and many others - most of the best groups are poorly funded, ignored by the media yet do the real cutting edge work |
"wise use" movement Greenpeace Guide to Anti-Environmental Groups is a good guide to "astroturf" pseudo-environmental groups set up by polluters to confuse the public. Greening Earth Society (created by fossil fuel interests) claims global warming is a good thing. |
| toxics | nuclear power and toxic chemicals are not so dangerous | permits for pollution ("who permits them to permit?") Rachel's Environment & Health News #442 - The Right To Pollute, May 18, 1995 |
precautionary principle - prevent pollution environmentalism is elemental: avoiding toxics requires avoiding certain elements (chlorine, bromine, heavy metals, radioactive elements above 83) carbohydrate economy - biomass instead of petrochemicals avoids most toxics bioremediation and mycoremediation (using nature to detoxify poisons) incineration of garbage creates new poisons not present in the original waste |
Chlorine Chemistry Council |
| food safety | Organic standards should include food irradiation, genetic engineering and sewage sludge fertilizers. (The US Department of Agriculture has sought these changes for many years.) | Center for Science in the Public Interest (does not oppose food irradiation, meek on most other food safety issues) |
Local, Organic and Vegan (LOV) |
|
| energy | Chevron-Texaco's campaign "Will You Join Us" (a pseudo-effort to admit to Peak Oil, which distracts from the fact they've known about it for decades and have blocked efforts for renewable energy and conservation more drilling, coal, tar sands, deep water drilling nuclear power as "solutions" to energy crisis |
Apollo Alliance claims renewable energy can keep our growth based economic system intact Most environmental groups strongly oppose oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, but were quiet about President Clinton's opening of the nearby Naval Petroleum Reserve -- an expanse of tundra as large as ANWR, complete with caribou, polar bears and mosquitos. National environmental groups are more likely to object to oil drilling proposals from Republicans than those from Democrats. |
Home Power magazine and most renewable energy businesses The time factor for converting from fossil and nuclear energy to renewables -- it should have been started three decades ago, long before Peak. |
hydrogen cars will seemlessly replace the current energy paradigm |
| global warming | global warming is not a problem | global warming is a problem, nukes are the solution | Post Carbon Institute and Peak Oil awareness movements - use remaining oil to relocalize production nuclear energy is toxic, dangerous, and requires huge fossil fuel inputs) |
global warming will be good for plant growth |
| deforestation | Clinton era "Option 9" claims that we can restore forest habitat while clearcutting old growth forests. Logging
helps keep salmon runs healthy |
Clinton's "Roadless Rule" passed at the end of his presidency (some positive steps, but it avoids protection of most remaining old growth). Clinton's enactment of the Sequoia National Monument on Earth Day 2000 -- a great pronouncement, but it merely renamed part of the Sequoia National Forest. Clearcutting of old growth forest still continues in this new "monument." The only Presidential candidate in 2000 who supported protecting ancient forests was Ralph Nader. Forest Certification - the Forest Stewardship Council standards still allow clearcuts. |
zero cut on public lands, switch to restoration forestry (to turn tree farms back to forests)
|