50 shades of green: A Field Guide to Environmentalism

This is a partial guide to the environmental movement (a comprehensive examination would be extremely large). The topics and representatives for each point of view are selective, not exhaustive.

this page is under construction - Feb. 7, 2013

 

Thus, confronted by powerful corporate opposition, the environmental movement has split in two. The older national environmental organizations, in their Washington offices, have taken the soft path of negotiation, compromising with the corporations about how much pollution is acceptable ... The people living in the polluted communities have taken the hard path of confrontation ... The national organizations deal with the environmental disease by negotiating about the kind of 'Band-Aid' to apply to it; the community groups deal with the disease by trying to prevent it.
-- Barry Commoner, Making Peace With the Planet, p. 179

Eco Issues
Dominant Paradigm Limited Hang Out Ideal Direction Disinformation
environmental philosophy no problems that technology can't solve

"smart growth"

environmental regulation

maintain economic growth

deep ecology

steady state economics

permaculture

locally controlled organic agriculture production

no jobs on a dead planet

Earth Liberation Front (how much of this is sincere, and how much are agents provocateurs smearing the environmental movement?)

Green Anarchy magazine (how many "cops are pigs" articles do we really need, anyway? and how does that bring about widespread support for social change?)

hyper-factionalization (parodied by Monty Python's The Life of Brian)

environmental groups

Environmental Protection Agency and state government affiliates

corporate polluters who pretend they are promoting "sustainability" (British Petroleum, Weyerhauser, Nike, among many others)

corporate environmental groups that endorsed the 1993 NAFTA treaty

  • Environmental Defense Fund
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Natural Resources Defense Council
  • National Audubon Society
  • National Wildlife Foundation
  • Conservation Foundation)

environmental groups that critique Republican destruction of the environment but stay silent on most Democratic destruction of the environment

  • Sierra Club (perhaps the most famous example, but there are many others)

An excellent review of the decline of the big green groups is Mark Dowie's book "Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century."

www.nonprofitwatch.org

Greenpeace (best of the large environmental groups)

Earth Island Institute

Rachel's environmental newsletter

grassroots forest protection, zero discharge, environmental justice, freeway fighters, renewable energy installers, safe food and many others - most of the best groups are poorly funded, ignored by the media yet do the real cutting edge work

"wise use" movement

Greenpeace Guide to Anti-Environmental Groups is a good guide to "astroturf" pseudo-environmental groups set up by polluters to confuse the public.

Greening Earth Society (created by fossil fuel interests) claims global warming is a good thing.

Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy

toxics nuclear power and toxic chemicals are not so dangerous

permits for pollution ("who permits them to permit?")

Rachel's Environment & Health News #442 - The Right To Pollute, May 18, 1995

precautionary principle - prevent pollution

environmentalism is elemental: avoiding toxics requires avoiding certain elements (chlorine, bromine, heavy metals, radioactive elements above 83)

carbohydrate economy - biomass instead of petrochemicals avoids most toxics

bioremediation and mycoremediation (using nature to detoxify poisons)

incineration of garbage creates new poisons not present in the original waste

Our Stolen Future

Pesticide Action Network North America

Chlorine Chemistry Council
food safety Organic standards should include food irradiation, genetic engineering and sewage sludge fertilizers. (The US Department of Agriculture has sought these changes for many years.) Center for Science in the Public Interest (does not oppose food irradiation, meek on most other food safety issues)

organicconsumers.org

Local, Organic and Vegan (LOV)

 
energy

Chevron-Texaco's campaign "Will You Join Us" (a pseudo-effort to admit to Peak Oil, which distracts from the fact they've known about it for decades and have blocked efforts for renewable energy and conservation

more drilling, coal, tar sands, deep water drilling

nuclear power as "solutions" to energy crisis

Apollo Alliance claims renewable energy can keep our growth based economic system intact

Most environmental groups strongly oppose oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, but were quiet about President Clinton's opening of the nearby Naval Petroleum Reserve -- an expanse of tundra as large as ANWR, complete with caribou, polar bears and mosquitos. National environmental groups are more likely to object to oil drilling proposals from Republicans than those from Democrats.

Home Power magazine and most renewable energy businesses

The time factor for converting from fossil and nuclear energy to renewables -- it should have been started three decades ago, long before Peak.

abiotic oil

hydrogen cars will seemlessly replace the current energy paradigm

global warming global warming is not a problem global warming is a problem, nukes are the solution

Post Carbon Institute and Peak Oil awareness movements - use remaining oil to relocalize production

nuclear energy is toxic, dangerous, and requires huge fossil fuel inputs)

global warming will be good for plant growth
deforestation

Clinton era "Option 9" claims that we can restore forest habitat while clearcutting old growth forests.

Logging helps keep salmon runs healthy
Carlton Yee ... former chairman of the California State Board of Forestry

Clinton's "Roadless Rule" passed at the end of his presidency (some positive steps, but it avoids protection of most remaining old growth).

Clinton's enactment of the Sequoia National Monument on Earth Day 2000 -- a great pronouncement, but it merely renamed part of the Sequoia National Forest. Clearcutting of old growth forest still continues in this new "monument." The only Presidential candidate in 2000 who supported protecting ancient forests was Ralph Nader.

Forest Certification - the Forest Stewardship Council standards still allow clearcuts.

zero cut on public lands, switch to restoration forestry (to turn tree farms back to forests)

forests.org

Heartwood